Archive for the ‘Isaac & Anna’ Category

More Larson Intermarriages

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

I have been very occupied transferring more data from “Larsons & Slettens 1985” and “Whence We Came” into my own database. Much of it was already there, thanks to Uncle Ivan and cousin Orrin Moen, who got me jump-started years ago when they both kindly sent me their entire databases. But there is still much to add, including some branches that were not there yet, and some corrections and source citations for the rest.

Two years ago, I expounded on the five marriages between Larsons and Slettens from 1898-1925. In my latest updating project, I discovered three other interesting marriages linking the Larsons, Slettens, Samuelsons, and Fransons. Two of these involve descendants of  Ole’s sisters Mari and Marit Larsdatter.

Marit

Marit Larsdatter 1838-1880

In 1893, Mari’s son, Henry “Haken” Hansen(1868-1936) married Clara Franson(1873-1942), sister of Mina Franson (who married Axel Larson). Henry and Clara issued 7 children, 22 grandchildren, and well over 50 great-grandchildren, all prior to 1985. Their children were cousins twice-over to the children of Axel and Mina: second cousins on the Larson side, and first cousins by the Fransons. By the way, Henry’s father and all of his siblings spelled their surname “Hanson.” For some reason, only Henry changed the spelling to “Hansen.”

1936

Henry & Clara with granddaughters Doris & Norma Sprague in 1936

Then in 1919, Albin Julian Erickson(1897-1964), grandson of Mari Larsdatter, married Myrtle Samuelson, niece of Ole Larson’s first wife, Anne Samuelsdatter. Thus, Isaac, Axel, Smith, and Louise Larson were all second cousins to Albin & Myrtle’s three children on both their father’s and mother’s sides. So, all the descendants of those four Larsons, including myself, are more distant double-cousins of dozens of Erickson descendants. Pardon the bad rhyme.

More recently, in 1946, Harold Lloyd Hutchins(b. 1927), great-grandson of Marit, married Helen Mae Olson(1927-1966), great-great-granddaughter of Ole Ellefsen Sletten. Thus, their descendants (two children and two grandchildren as of 1985) are related to all the Larsons and Slettens, and doubly related to the descendants of Paula Larson and Olaf Larson, via Clarence Sletten and Helga Sletten, respectively.

 

The Prison Site

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

In 1841, when Anne Larsdatter was imprisoned there, and gave birth to Ole, Oslo Prison (Kristiana Tukthus) was located at #33 Storgata (“main street”), less than a mile from the present-day Oslo Central train station. The front entrance may have looked much  as it does in this 1910 photo (courtesy digitalarkivet).

front doorAfter returning home, I got a link to oslobilder.no, “the official website for historic images from Oslo.” By searching the term “tukthuset,” (the prison) I got 49 photos, including the ones below:

south facadeThis shows the entire south facade facing Storgata, taken about 1900.

rear courtyardAnother 1910 photo shows the rear of the same building, with its attached wings, and a courtyard enclosed by a wooden fence.

courtyard2Another view of the courtyard in 1910. Note the extra-tall garret on the right, with no glass in the windows. One can almost imagine armed guards monitoring the prisoners, including Anne. In fact, one can see something inside the garret, but not clearly enough to tell if it is human forms.

The next two photos were taken in 1938, just before the prison was torn down.

Wall1Entrance to the prison yard on Bernt Ankers gate, a cross-street to Storgata. Unknown what street is on the right, or where this in relation to the previous photos.

Wall2Another part of the same stone wall, and a building not shown in the other photos.

Unfortunately for my efforts, the entire prison was demolished. On the site today stands a modern, 9-story office block. Exploring under a drizzling rain, here is what I found at Storgata 33.

Storgata 33About two blocks away, on the opposite side of Storgata (#46), stands a separate but related site called Prinds Kristian Augusts Minde. This site is partly preserved (although in poor condition), thanks to a historic monument designation in the 1990′s. This is my photo of the front gate and part of one of the buildings.

Minde gateBefore visiting, I thought that the prison was also a part of this compound, although it was outside the area currently under protection, having already been demolished. The Minde, as it is known, was originally a lavish Medieval estate. It was purchased by a philanthropic organization in the 1810′s, for use as a workhouse, poor hospital, and insane-asylum. In theory, destitute people could come voluntarily, but in reality, it was usually forced upon them.

Another building in the preservation area is an old factory, probably for textile manufacture.

FactoryI imagined that Anne Larsdatter may have been forced to toil in such a place, but it seems she probably had it even worse. I next visited the University of Oslo, which is celebrating a historic occasion of its own.

UniversityProfessor Hilde Sandvik of the Institute for History and Archaeology took time from her busy schedule to meet briefly with me, and referred me to other scholars whom I later contacted by email.

I learned that the prison, despite its close proximity, was always completely separate from the Minde, and the prisoners lived and worked under conditions worse than those of the workhouse inmates across the street. I leave you with one final photo of the prison’s interior, again from around 1910. I don’t know whether this was a living or working area. Either way, it must have been pretty grim.

Prison interiorMore details as I learn them. Keep in mind, though, that Anne and baby Ole not only survived this ordeal, but came to America a quarter-century later, and founded the family that today numbers in the thousands.

A Slender Thread

Saturday, June 4th, 2011

Amund VoldenOne of the four immigrant families that form the starting point for cousin Orrin Moen’s book, Whence We Came, is that of Amund Amundsen Volden, whose grave I visited at Coon Prairie in 2009.

Volden StoneThis is an important line; the one that Orrin traced back to King Haakon V and all that medieval royalty. Orrin’s sources are not listed in the database he shared with me, so I have been trying to match some of the facts with sources that I can find. Amund Volden’s baptismal name was Amund Amundsen Dalsegvolden. Here is his christening record from Sør-Fron:

Amund christening

Here is a link to the image at digitalarkivet. Born 11 Sept, christened 04 Oct. Parents (unmarried!) are Amund Olsen Roen and Anne Amundsdatter Dalsegvolden. Sponsors included John(?) Gryttingsmoen, Johannes Röen, and Kari Roen, and two others, illegible. No sponsors from Dalseg or Dalsegvolden, interestingly. Final note in the parents’ column, underlined for emphasis: begge 3ri (…?) to the effect that this was the third illegitimate child for both parents. I think we have the makings of some scandal here.

From this point, things get complicated, due to the frequent changes of peoples’ surnames. Orrin’s data, and that on Tor Onshus’ excellent site, Genealogy from Ringebu and Gudbrandsdalen, name Amund Olsen Roen’s father as Ole Olsen Kongsli, and also give the date of Amund Olsen’s birth as 1801. Like Orrin, Tor also traces this line back to Haakon V. Anyway, maybe Amund Olsen “Roen” was also a “Kongsli?”

Sure enough, I found the christening of Amund Olsen Kongsli, 29 November 1801. Parents are Ole Olsen Kongsli and Marit Amundsdatter. Sponsors include Tosten Lunde, Ole Lunde, Kari Lunde, Marit Kongsli, and one illegible. Lunde is the farm that mother Marit Amundsdatter came from. Amund must be the second son of the couple, thus is named after his maternal grandfather (father of Marit Amundsdatter).

But I need some evidence that the two Amund Olsen’s are the same person. Nothing in these two christening records point in that direction, so I decided to look for later records of Amund Olsen Kongsli and/or Roen. So far, nothing further on A. O. Roen. Amund Kongsli was confirmed in 1817. No information there, except for his name. But the next record I found cast some doubt on the “dual” identity. Amund Olsen Kongsli married Anne Olsadatter Tagestad 28 June 1830, nine months after the (illegitimate) birth of Amund A. Dalsegvolden.

This is somewhat upsetting for a couple of reasons. If we are looking at the same person, it seems quite odd that his surname changed from Roen, *back* to his natal surname, Kongsli. Also, the one witness to this marriage is Ole Kongsli (probably the groom’s brother). There are no Roen’s, or even Tagestad’s, listed. Still nothing to tie the two names together.

Another interesting detail in this record is a note to the effect that the marriage was permitted by a letter of acceptance from the KING! Wow, I have never seen anything like that before. A chat partner in Norway speculated that it may have been because the bride and groom were related, e.g. first cousins. Another possibility is that permission may have been needed after the three illegitimate children born earlier to the groom and another woman. Hmm … I wonder if that letter may be on file at the Sør-Fron church. A long shot, but something to check on while I am “in the neighborhood.”

In any case, it seems that the family had some connections in high places. Remember that the Kongsli line is the one leading back to the Fairhair dynasty 400 years earlier. Indeed, the farm name itself contains the Norwegian word for “king.” It is not documented, but historians believe the farm may once have belonged to the Crown. Of course, if that was between 1400 and 1814, it would have been the king of Denmark, whereas at the time of this marriage, the king of Sweden ruled over Norway.

But I digress. Final exhibit:  the christening of Ole Amundsen Tagestad in 1834, son of Amund Olsen and Anne Olsdatter. Yikes, another surname change! Apparently, the married couple took up residence at the bride’s family farm – not at all unusual. Sponsors/witnesses include Ole Kongsli (clinching the parents’ identity), and Anne, Tor, and Embjør Roenstad. At last, a possible connection with the Roen farm. Unfortunately, the handwriting is not very clear. Instead of Roenstad, it might be Rolstad, another farm in the area (and home of some other ancestors of ours). In the former case, the evidence is frail; in the latter, non-existent. Another quandary to pack along to Norway … Stay tuned.

 



Cross-Relations

Monday, May 9th, 2011

As I observed when discussing the arithmetic, most or all people are likely some degree of cousins, however distant; ergo, most or all married couples must be each other’s cousins. So, it is not surprising that I have already found the “cousin-hood” of my own parents, and one set of great-grandparents. In both cases, the common ancestor I identified was way back in ancient history, i.e. before 1100 CE.

Now, upon closer study of my ancestors in Norway, I find that my paternal grandparents, Isaac Larson and Anna Moen, may also have been cousins; in fact, not nearly such distant ones. The common ancestor is John Nilsen Nordgard Bryn, who appears in the “farm and family book,” or bygdebok for Fron parish. He was the father of Nils Johnsen, the earliest farmer the book names for the Skurdalshaugen farm, in 1723. Birth and death dates for the two are not given. The key here is the farm name: Skurdalshaugen. Although I do not have positive documentation yet, I believe that the same Jon Nilsen was possibly also the father of David Jonsen, also of Skurdalshaugen. According to the Ragnhild Letter, David Jonsen was born in 1737, which is a bit problematic, as I will show later.

Starting with the common ancestor, here are the two lines:

John Nilsen Nordgard Bryn
Nils Jonsen Skurdalshaugen b. ? (was adult by 1723)
John Nilsen Skurdalshaugen, b. 1742(?)
Nils Jonsen Maurhaugen b. 1758 (? improbable – only 16 years after father)
Mads Nielsen Maurhaugen b. 1796
Anne Madsdatter Maurhaugen b. 1829
Marie Amundsdatter Volden b. 1858
Anna Moen b. 1888

John Nilsen Nordgard Bryn
David Jonsen Skurdalshaugen b. 1737(?)
Lars Davidsen Skurdalshaugen b. 1763
Anne Larsdatter Skurdalshaugen b. 1801
Ole Larson b. 1841
Isaac Larson b. 1884

If correct, this makes Isaac and Anna fourth cousins, twice removed. The separation by two generations between husband and wife seems counter-intuitive at first, but is really quite plausible. Note that only two generations back, the grandmothers are already 28 years apart.

The necessary leap of faith is to assume that David Jonsen’s birth date is incorrect. To be proprietor of a farm in 1723, David’s (possible) brother Nils must have been born before about 1700. It is unlikely he would have a brother more than 37 years younger than himself. Not impossible, though, at least for a half-brother; Ole Larson’s thirteen children (by two wives) spanned a period of 29 years. But if David’s correct birth date were around 10-15 years earlier, say 1722-1727, all the numbers would work quite well. Keep in mind that the churchbooks (kirkeboker) for Fron parish prior to 1799 were destroyed by fire, so no vital records are extant for the period in question. I did not find David Jonsen in the bygdebok, and do not know how Ragnhild came up with the date.

Of course, I have been proven wrong on assumptions that seemed a lot safer than this one. Another puzzle to take along to Norway in August.

Moen Descendants Added

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

I have just posted the second item in the “Descendants” section. It is “Whence We Came,” by cousin Orrin Moen. Orrin wrote this book shortly after Aline published “Larsons & Slettens” in the late 1980′s. In addition to the Moen’s, three more immigrant families are detailed: Volden, Hovde, and Franson.  A few words are in order about how all these families are related to the Larsons.

Let us confine the discussion to biological relationships. Relations by marriage are multiple, very much more complex, and certainly link us all. First, the descendants of Isaac Larson are related to all the Moen’s and the Volden’s (Family of Anna “Annie” Moen’s mother). Next, the Axel Larson line is related to all of the Franson’s (relatives of Axel’s wife, Mina “Minnie” Franson). Thus, Isaac’s and Axel’s descendants are listed in both books (Aline’s and Orrin’s). Finally, Axel’s line is also related to the descendants of Jeremias Hovde, who married Minnie’s sister, Laura Franson. This line includes George Moen’s descendants (including author Orrin).

Happy exploring! Don’t forget to ask me for the password if you don’t have it yet.

Lovell and Reatha Were Cousins, Too!

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Tracing back from the “Pilgrim connection,”  I uncovered not one, but two common ancestors of my parents, Lovell and Reatha (Myers) Larson.

One is the emperor Charlemegne himself (742-814 C.E.), whom Orrin Moen traced as the 34th great-grandfather of Lovell through Lovell’s mother Anna Moen, and Charlemagne’s son Louis I “The Pious.” And now, I have identified another son of Charlemagne, Pepin of Italy, as the 34th great-grandfather of Reatha through her father Dan Myers, making Charlemagne Reatha’s 35th great. This makes Lovell and Reatha approximately 35th cousins, once removed. This is actually a redundant connection, as Charlemagne is again an ancestor of Dan Myers through another marriage several generations later; this time the nearest common ancestor is Louis I. Yet another “nearest common” is Baldwin II, son of Judith Martel. By the time I  finished with all these threads, I ended up with at least eight different lines leading to Charlemagne .

The second distinct connection is in Kiev(!) Yaroslav I “the Wise,”(978-1054) Duke of Kiev, is the 28th great-grandfather of Lovell, and the 27th great of Reatha. By this line, my parents are approx. 28th cousins, again once removed. More proof that if you go back far enough, we are all cousins. These 11th-century rulers of Kiev were intermarried with at least one Scandinavian … perhaps my next project will trace Reatha’s ancestors into pre-Christian Norway.

Larson “Mob” photo revisited

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

In an earlier post, I put up a recently discovered photo of a large group of (mostly?) Larsons, taken in August 1917. I even ventured a few guesses as to the identity of some individuals. After long study and comparisons, I am changing one or two of those guesses, and adding a few more. However (to repeat myself), I am not very good at this, so take it all with a grain of salt, and chime in with any guesses or critiques you wish. Click on any of these photos for an enlarged rendition.

Group 1-A

Group 1-A

1917Group1-B

Group 1-B

Group 2

Group 2

Groups 1-A and 1-B must have been taken just seconds apart. All the same people, with one exception, in the same arrangement. Group 2 has most of the same people, with several missing, three added, and  all rearranged.

Let’s start with the Larson boys, Lovell and Walt. I think we can all agree that they are #30 and 31, although which one is which is not quite so clear. I’m leaning toward #30 for Lovell.

Next, the four Larson men: Axel (2), Isaac (6), Oscar (10), and Olaf (14), and one spouse I am pretty confident of, Anna (22) *(caveat at end of post). I am now convinced that the photo below (long familiar from my mother’s collection, and also included in Lucy’s albums) was taken on the same occasion, not least because the four  men are wearing the same clothes (sans hats).

Probable date: 1917

Probable date: 1917

Two Larson children are identified by labels on other photos in Lucy’s album: Edna (Kohlstead, Louise’s 13-year-old daughter, #29), and Lenora Larson (25). Also identified this way are Edna’s two companions, Ruth (26) and Lois (29), last names and relationships unknown as yet.

Let’s show those thumbnails again, and go a little further out on a limb:

Group 1-AGroup 1-A
1917Group1-B

Group 1-B

Group 2

Group 2

Four semi-wild guesses based on comparison with at least one other photo: Mina Larson (19, or possibly 4), Inar Amundson (3), Emily Hart Amundson (18), and Mary Hart Larson (13). Note the resemblance between 13 and 18 when they are standing close together in Group 2. Finally, the small children, based on their apparent age and association: Harvey Larson (1), Neva Larson (33 – appears only in group 2), Norman Amundson (20), and Glenn Amundson (24).

Wilder yet, I think I may have spotted one Samuelson in there, which could imply there are others. I’ll go into that in a later post, as well as responding to the many comments I hope to receive on this one.

* Vernon Larson was born 23 July 1917, less than a month before the labeled date of the above photo. So why isn’t the baby there, if Anna and Isaac both are? Below is a picture from the following winter:

Winter 1917-18

Winter 1917-18

Again, you can click on the photo to enlarge. It’s a long shot, but maybe Tom Moen is in that mob photo too! Stay tuned.

Group 1-A

Group 1-A

1917Group1-B

Group 1-B

Group 2

New immigration info, Sletten and Moen

Friday, November 20th, 2009

I finally was able to look through a book I have been coveting for some time. It is not an old book, but is quite rare, and not available for inter-library loan, or even local library loan. The nearest copy to me is in the PLU library “special collection.”

Utvandringa

Ringebu parish, Gudbrandsdal, is where the Slettens and the Moens came from. The first 40 pages of the book contain a narrative and discussion of emigration from Norway in general, and from Gudbrandsadal in particular. I copied that section, and will get part of it translated eventually. The rest of the book is filled with names of emigrants, arranged chronologically. I was lucky enough to find ten names I was looking for.

I began with Engebret and Gunder Olson (Sletten) as kind of a warm-up exercise. I had already found their emigration record, which shows they departed Oslo on 3 June 1881, on the steamship Angelo. As I hoped, they were easy to find.Engebret-GunderEncouraged by this success, I began scanning the following pages for the rest of the Slettens, who were said to have come at some unknown later date, not necessarily all at once. It turns out they *were* all together, in 1884.OleSletten-et-alSo, this is the new (to me) information: “Papa” Ole Ellefsen Sletten, Elsie, Johannes, and Mathia (the spellings they used in America), departed Oslo 16 May 1884, also on the Angelo. That gets them as far as England. Still to be traced is how they got from there to America. Note that there is no “residential” surname associated with any of them, not “Sletten” nor any other.

As for the Moens, cousin Orrin’s book “Whence We Came” says they came over in 1877, and sure enough:Torger-er-alGunder Torgerson (Moen) is Anna Moen’s father, my great-grandpa; Torger, then, is my great-great. This record is the first I have seen with destination Minnesota.  Be that as it may, they settled permanently in Vernon County, Wisconsin, as did the Slettens. I visited their graves in June 2009 at Brush Creek and Coon Prairie. I didn’t check with Orrin yet; he may already have known the date and ship, but they are new to me. Two of Torger’s daughters, Randine and Sigrid, are not listed. They must have come separately, as Randine married and raised a large family here. Orrin’s book has no information on Sigrid, other than she had no children, and a picture of Randine and Sigrid together.

Also of note in this record is “Moen,” as part of the residential surname, Rørviksmoen. The suffix “moen” appears with many farm names; I haven’t figured out what it may signify. There are some “Moen” farms elsewhere, but none near Ringebu parish. Orrin, who has explored the area, once told me he didn’t think there even was a “Moen” farm associated with the family. This is not at all unusual (see Slettens).

Analagous to the “moen” in “Rørviksmoen,” may be the suffix “-haugen,” as in “Skurdalshaugen” and  “Bakkehaugen.” “Haugen” is translated as “pasture,” or “small hill.” There are also a few farms named “Haugen,” period. Think: Professor Harold “Hill.”

Pardon the poor copy, it was scanned from the newspaper-like printing of Orrin’s book. Thanks to cousin Orrin for publishing it all those years ago.

 

Date of photos unknown

Date of photos unknown

This *may* be my last post before Thanksgiving. I need to get some fiction written; I’m falling behind on that project.

 

 

Whom do you take after?

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Again, it was a comment by cousin Lois that kind of got me on a kick. She remarked how much the childhood picture of her dad resembled her own childhood pictures. In fact, I found one that is pretty blurry but really captures what Lois was saying. Not only the expression, but the stocking cap, and even the hands – as if grasping a steering wheel (or maybe reins, in Walt’s case). I have some cuter and clearer pictures of little Lois, but this one best makes her point.1913-1938 Walt-LoisBut it isn’t just Lois and her dad. Check out Reatha and daughter Darlene – both in one of their cheesier moments.1932-1950 Rea-Dar cheesySorry if I’m embarrassing anyone. Now I’m going to flog myself a little. Here I am celebrating my fifth birthday with a pout as big as any of my dad’s “famous” ones.1919-1952 Lov GeoEven though my high-school portrait is one I thoroughly loathe, there are a few similarities to my infinitely more handsome father and uncles.

1964-1941 Geo Lov UnclesAnd to my (even more handsome) Grandpa.

1912-1964 Ike GeoFinally, a couple of pairs from the next generations.

1963-1995c San Claire KLynn Anna

Next: Pictures of poverty

“The Shack” Improved

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Cousin Eric took the “Shack” photo from the previous post, and edited it for more contrast and clarity. Thanks, cousin! I have been fooling around with this photo and others, trying to duplicate Eric’s excellent results. So far, I’m not even close.

The Shack, c. 1910, clarified

The Shack, c. 1910, clarified

Tomorrow: the Nesseth connection.